- 2.8GHz Intel Core i7-7700HQ processor
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB graphics
- 17.3in 1920 x 1080 IPS screen
- 16GB DDR4 memory
- 128GB Kingston SSD
- 1yr RTB warranty
Design and build
The Helios 300 NH-Q2MEK.004 blends current touches with the sort of configuration I’d connect with more standard gaming scratch pad, which means it more than looks like it.
The Predator’s body is worked from dark metal, and crosswise over a large portion of its surfaces, it’s treated with a matte complete – besides the top, that has AN unpretentious brushed impact. It’s reminiscent of its closest adversary – the Asus ROG Strix GL702VM. That framework consolidates dull metal with orange, and it too exiles obsolete and gleaming metal for a more unpretentious approach.
Saying this doesn’t imply that that Acer’s machine is saved. Its top highlights red slices and a strong logo, and the back edge houses sensational air vents with red fringes. there’s more red around the console and trackpad, and another Predator logo beneath the 17.3-inch screen.
It’s a gorgeous machine that weighs just back of 3kg and it quantifies 29mm thick. Those figures aren’t extremely difficult, despite the fact that the Asus was around 300g lighter and a large portion of a centimeter more slender.
Assemble quality is one range where the Predator falls down marginally. The metal on the base of the machine is too skinny and discourages effectively, and the screen is flimsy. I’d be watchful taking this machine out and concerning. The Asus framework was comparatively shaky.
The Acer has the typical choice of ports, including USB 3.1 Type-C, and 2 boards on the bottom take into account access to the hard circle and memory spaces – something ailing in the Asus.
Keyboard and trackpad
A red-lit console is a Scrabble-tile unit harrowed with a considerable lot of the quality characteristics that make such units incredible for writing yet truthful to the game.
The Acer’s console has a solid base, which is a decent begin, and the catches are peaceful and steady, with great writing speed. In any case, they’re delicate and provide almost no travel, which implies they don’t feel sufficiently firm amid quickly paced gaming sessions.
The Asus machine features a comparable console, but with a lot of travel, so its gaming prospects are similarly as average.
The console design here is disillusioning, as well. The Acer’s 17.3-inch define implies there ought to be a lot of space for keys, however, the pointer catches are tight and cramped, and the circumstance is that the same with both Shift keys and the return catch. it isn’t a major issue, particularly once you’ve clad to be utilized to the console, however, it is a bit of astounding.
The trackpad is surely sufficiently huge, however, its catches let it down. They discourage too far, and the activity is not reliable – there is a recognizable “knock” largely down the system. Incidentally, that is the issue that many people favor in mechanical consoles, yet the Acer’s delicate and rough catch presses are far from the short and shallow activity that I incline toward for mobile gaming.
Screen and sound quality
The Predator’s 17.3-inch screen rules a piece space. it has a 1080p determination, that is fine for a laptop this size, in spite of the fact that drawing near to the board reveals the absence of sharpness. This was seen on the Asus as well.
The revive rate tops at 60Hz, that is the same as the Asus, however, the last laptop likewise had Nvidia G-Sync, so it could synchronize GPU yield and screen invigorate rates at up to 60fps. that’s perfect for a GTX 1050 Ti machine, yet the Acer passes up a serious opportunity – despite the fact that it prices about £200 more than the Asus. Thus, gaming won’t be very as smooth on the Predator.
The Acer’s benchmarks are strong and predictable. The shine level of 397 nits is one of the most elevated figures I’ve seen from a gaming scratch pad, and the dark level of 0.47 is found – a smidgen high, yet not all that terrible that it will cause issues
Dark shades will look sufficiently dim, and those outcomes make a quality proportion of 845:1. that is an average outcome and, once more, it won’t meddle with diversions. So, the Asus offered a superior differentiation proportion and dark level, influencing it to look somewhat more extensive and more striking.
The Acer’s Delta E of 2.86 is great, and past the Asus’ consequence of 3.43, and the Predator conveyed a shading temperature of 7180K – around 500K nearer to the vi,500K perfect than the Asus may oversee. The Acer rendered 86.5% of the sRGB shading extent, which is sufficient.
Review points are great on this IPS board, and there were no real consistency problems. The Acer’s screen is somewhat preferable as far as hues over its adversary yet somewhat poorer on differentiate – the absence of G-Sync. The Acer’s board isn’t terrible, yet I figure the Asus’ screen is quite recently that bit better.
The speakers gift a lot of volumes, however, the variable is ruled by the vocals, that figured out how to sound somewhat level while pushing one another clamor out of the spotlight. the typical sound yield can’t be overseen or changed by programming, either – so I’d unquestionably change to a receiver.